Integrated Project Plan for Separation

Integrated Project Plan for Separation

Explains how to merge every functional workstream—finance, IT, HR, operations, legal, communications, and TSA exit—into a single, baseline-locked roadmap that serves as the programme’s source of truth. The plan combines a master work-breakdown structure, dependency-linked Gantt chart, critical-path analysis, resource heat map, milestone calendar, and live risk-issue-change registers, allowing the PMO and Steering Committee to track scope, schedule, budget, and risk in real time. By sequencing cross-functional tasks, assigning single-point owners, and embedding variance dashboards, the integrated plan eliminates hidden conflicts, accelerates decision-making, and keeps Day 1 and post-close objectives on a predictable path to completion.

Purpose

Create one authoritative roadmap that aligns every functional work-stream, external partner, and TSA dependency to a common timeline and critical path.

Core Components

  • Master Work-Breakdown Structure (WBS) – Hierarchical list of all tasks, sub-tasks, and deliverables, each with unique ID and owner.
  • Gantt-Style Timeline – Visual schedule showing task durations, start/finish dates, and dependencies.
  • Critical-Path Analysis – Identification of tasks with zero float; any slip here delays Day 1.
  • Resource Plan – Allocation of full-time equivalents, third-party hours, and budget by work-stream and month.
  • Milestone Calendar – Key checkpoints such as mock cut-over, regulatory approvals, TSA exits, and Day 1 readiness gates.
  • Risk & Issue Log – Central register with probability/impact scores, mitigation actions, and escalation status.
  • Change-Control Register – Record of scope, schedule, or budget changes with approval history.

Step-by-Step Build Process

  • Consolidate Work-Stream Plans
    • Collect detailed task lists from IT, Finance, HR, Legal, Operations, Supply Chain, and TSA owners.
    • Align task naming conventions and coding structures for easy roll-up.
  • Sequence and Link Dependencies
    • Use predecessor–successor logic to connect tasks (e.g., “ERP data migration” precedes “finance opening balances”).
    • Highlight cross-functional dependencies in red for weekly review.
  • Assign Ownership and Effort
    • Every task gets a single accountable owner and estimated hours or cost.
    • Load resource constraints to flag over-allocations early.
  • Validate Critical Path
    • Run scheduling software to identify zero-slack activities.
    • Present critical path to Steering Committee; secure commitment to protect those tasks from scope creep.
  • Set Baseline
    • Freeze task dates, budgets, and scope once approved by the PMO and Steering Committee.
    • Use this baseline for variance tracking.
  • Establish Reporting Cadence
    • Weekly work-stream status reports rolled into a PMO dashboard.
    • RAG (Red/Amber/Green) status for schedule, budget, scope, and risk at both work-stream and programme level.
  • Integrate TSA Exit Milestones
    • Insert TSA sunset dates and exit-readiness checkpoints directly into the master plan.
    • Link replacement-system build tasks to corresponding TSA exit milestones.

Governance and Control

  • Weekly PMO Review – Focus on schedule variance, critical-path tasks due in next 14 days, and new risks/issues.
  • Monthly Steering-Committee Meeting – Approve major changes, unblock escalated issues, and review budget burn.
  • Change-Control Thresholds – Any variance > ±5 % schedule or budget requires Steering-Committee approval.

Deliverables

  • Integrated project-plan file (MS Project or equivalent) with resource, cost, and baseline data.
  • Critical-path snapshot and narrative summary for executive communication.
  • RAG dashboard with earned-value metrics (planned vs. actual work and cost).
  • Updated risk, issue, and change-control logs.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Allowing each function to manage its own plan in isolation—leads to missed cross-dependencies.
  • Ignoring resource constraints—people double-booked across work-streams create hidden delays.
  • Updating schedules informally—changes outside the change-control process erode baseline integrity.
  • Failing to integrate TSA exit milestones—services linger, costs balloon, and independence slips.

A comprehensive, enforced integrated project plan keeps every team marching in lockstep toward a seamless Day 1 and an on-time TSA exit.

 

The Umbrex Carve-Out Playbook: A practitioner's guide to planning and executing corporate divestitures with seamless separations, TSAs, and Day-1 readiness.

Request the Carve-Out Playbook

Table of Contents:

Table of Contents

How to get started

1

arrow-down-blue

Tell us about your project

2

arrow-down-blue

Interview candidates

(We’ll provide bios within 48 hours on average)

3

Select your consultant and start work

Find a Consultant

or email us at: [email protected]