Unconventional Play Assessment and Development Planning

Unconventional Play Assessment and Development Planning

Goal of the analysis:

To evaluate the resource potential, economic viability, and optimal development strategies for unconventional reservoirs (e.g., shale, tight gas, coalbed methane) to maximize recovery and profitability.

Data required:

  • Geological and geochemical data (e.g., TOC, maturity, mineralogy)
  • Well logs, core samples, and production test data
  • Reservoir properties such as permeability, porosity, and pressure
  • Drilling and completion cost estimates
  • Fracture stimulation design parameters
  • Infrastructure and market access considerations
  • Environmental and regulatory constraints

Detailed step-by-step instruction on how to conduct the analysis:

1. Characterize reservoir properties: Gather well log, core, and geochemical data to determine key reservoir attributes (e.g., TOC, porosity, permeability, brittleness) that influence productivity.

2. Map and segment the play: Use geological and geophysical data to outline prospective areas and categorize them based on reservoir quality and depth.

3. Analyze drilling and completion techniques: Investigate past well performances, fracturing methods, and completion designs to identify best practices for maximizing recovery.

4. Estimate development costs and break-even economics: Incorporate drilling, completion, and operating expenses to calculate break-even prices under different production scenarios.

5. Conduct pilot programs or test wells: Drill a limited number of wells to confirm geologic assumptions, fracturing effectiveness, and initial production rates.

6. Develop an integrated field development plan: Define optimal well spacing, drilling sequence, and infrastructure requirements based on pilot results and economic models.

7. Incorporate environmental and regulatory considerations: Ensure compliance with local rules, manage water usage, and plan for waste disposal or emissions control.

8. Perform sensitivity analyses: Evaluate how variations in commodity prices, operational costs, or technological improvements might affect project returns.

Format of the output of analysis:

  • Geological and reservoir quality maps or diagrams
  • Drilling, completion, and fracture stimulation design recommendations
  • Economic models (e.g., IRR, payback period, break-even price) for multiple development scenarios
  • Summary of key risks, regulatory challenges, and mitigation strategies

How to interpret results:

  • Plays with favorable reservoir properties, moderate drilling and completion costs, and robust initial production rates are more likely to yield attractive returns.
  • Higher break-even prices or lengthy payback periods may indicate a need for technological improvements or cost reductions.
  • Pilot well outcomes and sensitivity analyses help refine development plans and reduce uncertainties associated with unconventional reservoirs.

Steps a company can take to improve on this measure:

1. Invest in advanced geochemical and petrophysical analysis to better understand reservoir heterogeneity.

2. Optimize drilling and completion designs by experimenting with different well geometries, fracture stage spacing, and proppant volumes.

3. Leverage horizontal or multilateral drilling where feasible to increase reservoir contact and maximize recovery.

4. Explore innovative cost-saving measures in drilling, fracturing, and supply chain to lower overall project costs.

5. Implement continuous improvement programs by analyzing lessons learned from pilot projects and updating development plans accordingly.

Request the PDF Download of How to Analyze an Upstream Oil Company

Table of Contents