Executive Overview
CBL Properties is a U.S. retail real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on owning, leasing, managing, and redeveloping enclosed malls and open-air shopping centers. Founded in 1978 and headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee, CBL is best understood as a middle-market retail landlord rather than a trophy-asset mall owner: many of its properties serve secondary and tertiary trade areas where a well-located center can remain an important local destination for shopping, dining, services, and entertainment. After years of pressure from department-store closures, tenant bankruptcies, e-commerce, and then the pandemic, CBL entered Chapter 11 in 2020 and emerged in 2021 with a reworked balance sheet. Since then, its public strategy has centered on leasing, occupancy improvement, adaptive reuse of former anchor space, tighter expense control, and disciplined capital allocation. The portfolio is entirely U.S.-based, with greater exposure to the Southeast and Midwest than to coastal gateway markets. That positioning gives CBL a different risk-return profile from higher-end mall REITs: less luxury exposure, but often more redevelopment optionality at a lower basis. For FY2024, CBL reported revenue of #N/A.
CBL Properties at a Glance
| Logo | |
|---|---|
| Common name | CBL Properties |
| Full legal name | CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. |
| Headquarters | Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States |
| Ownership | Publicly traded REIT; no controlling shareholder publicly disclosed |
| Ticker | CBL |
| Exchange | NYSE - New York Stock Exchange |
| Market Cap | $1.54B |
| Revenue (FY2024) | #N/A |
| Founding / major historical milestones | Founded in 1978 by Charles B. Lebovitz; became a public REIT in 1993; filed for Chapter 11 in 2020; emerged from restructuring in 2021 |
| Industry or industries | Retail REIT; commercial real estate; shopping centers and malls |
| Key products or services | Leasing of retail space in enclosed malls and open-air centers; redevelopment of anchor boxes and outparcels; property management and related real estate services |
| Geographic footprint | United States only; portfolio concentrated in the Southeast and Midwest, with exposure to secondary and tertiary markets |
| Business segments as officially reported | One reportable segment: shopping center properties |
| Company website | https://www.cblproperties.com/ |
1. What Is the Strategy of CBL Properties?
Based on CBL Properties’ annual filings, investor materials, and post-restructuring operating priorities, the company’s strategy is best understood as a focused recovery-and-repositioning strategy for middle-market retail real estate. Using the Playing to Win framework:
-
1a. What is the winning aspiration of CBL Properties?
CBL Properties’ practical aspiration is to maximize long-term value from its shopping-center portfolio by producing durable cash flow, improving occupancy and asset productivity, and maintaining a healthier balance sheet than it had before its 2020 restructuring. The company has not presented a single headline multiyear revenue target in the way some industrial or software companies do. Instead, “winning” appears to mean higher same-center net operating income, better leasing results, productive reuse of former department-store space, and enough liquidity and financing flexibility to redevelop assets rather than sell them under pressure.
-
1b. Where does CBL Properties play?
CBL plays in U.S. retail real estate, specifically enclosed malls and open-air centers, with concentration in middle-market communities and a heavier footprint in the Southeast and Midwest. It does not try to compete broadly across every property type or geography. Its focus is on trade areas where its centers can remain locally important and where redevelopment can materially improve traffic and tenant productivity. On the customer side, it plays with national, regional, and local tenants whose businesses still benefit from physical presence, including value retail, restaurants, entertainment, fitness, beauty, and service uses.
-
1c. How does CBL Properties plan to win?
CBL is not trying to win through luxury positioning or by owning the highest-rent malls in the country. Its playbook is different: own assets that matter in their local markets, lease them actively, backfill vacancy quickly, repurpose weak department-store boxes, shift the tenant mix toward categories that are harder to replace online, and allocate capital carefully. The company’s value proposition to tenants is a combination of local trade-area access, operating support, and relatively flexible space solutions. The company’s value proposition to investors is that targeted redevelopment and better leasing can improve cash flow from an already-built asset base.
-
1d. What capabilities must CBL Properties have in place?
To make that strategy work, CBL needs strong leasing relationships, disciplined redevelopment underwriting, local market knowledge, effective property management, and reliable balance-sheet management. It also needs the ability to convert legacy mall space into new uses at acceptable returns. That requires internal coordination across leasing, construction, legal, finance, and operations. In practical terms, a retail REIT like CBL wins when it can move spaces from vacancy to opening efficiently, keep common-area costs controlled, and refinance debt without consuming all the value created by redevelopment.
-
1e. What management systems does CBL Properties require?
CBL needs management systems centered on property-level budgeting, occupancy and lease-expiration tracking, tenant-sales and rent-spread monitoring, redevelopment capital approval, and liquidity and debt-maturity oversight. Because depreciation can distort the economics of real estate under GAAP, metrics such as net operating income, funds from operations, adjusted funds from operations, occupancy, rent collections, and leasing spreads are especially important. It also needs systems that monitor co-tenancy risk, tenant credit quality, insurance and tax inflation, and the return on each redevelopment dollar.
2. What Are the Current Strategic Initiatives of CBL Properties?
CBL Properties’ recent public disclosures point to a handful of recurring strategic initiatives that are tightly linked to the economics of a restructured mall and shopping-center portfolio.
Leasing up vacancy and improving occupancy
CBL continues to focus on new leasing, renewals, and bringing signed tenants to opening. This matters most in small-shop and junior-anchor space, where rents per square foot are generally much higher than anchor rents. For CBL, occupancy gains are not just a cosmetic metric; they directly influence same-center net operating income, tenant traffic, and the valuation of each center.
Redeveloping former department-store boxes and other underused space
Former anchor space remains one of the company’s most important strategic problems and one of its biggest opportunities. CBL has emphasized adaptive reuse and redevelopment of vacant or obsolete boxes into higher-productivity uses such as off-price retail, food and beverage, fitness, entertainment, services, and other traffic-driving concepts. In some cases, the opportunity can extend to non-retail or mixed-use concepts if local economics support it.
Shifting the tenant mix toward more durable categories
The company’s leasing strategy has gradually moved beyond a traditional apparel-heavy mall mix. Public materials indicate a continued emphasis on categories that are more visit-driven and less directly exposed to online substitution, including value retail, restaurants, beauty, health, entertainment, and service tenants. This diversification matters because it can reduce dependence on any one retail format and make the center more relevant throughout the week.
Maintaining balance-sheet flexibility
Since emerging from Chapter 11 in 2021, CBL’s financial posture has been more disciplined. Management has continued to emphasize liquidity, debt-maturity management, refinancing activity where available, and capital-spending discipline. Strategically, this is essential: a mall landlord cannot execute a multi-year redevelopment agenda if debt pressure forces near-term asset sales or excessive defensive spending.
Capital recycling and portfolio optimization
CBL appears to use parcel monetization, outparcel development, and selective asset actions as a source of capital and portfolio sharpening. The broad theme is not aggressive empire building. It is capital recycling: directing money toward the properties and projects with the best risk-adjusted returns and away from assets with weaker strategic fit or limited upside.
3. What Is the Business Model of CBL Properties?
CBL Properties is a lease-driven real estate business. Its customers are primarily tenants, and what they buy is not just square footage but access to a local trade area, shopper traffic, parking, co-tenancy, visibility, and operational support.
- What customers actually buy: retail space in malls and open-air centers, plus the right to operate within an established property ecosystem. A strong center offers traffic, adjacency to other tenants, signage, common-area upkeep, and local market presence.
- Recurring versus one-time revenue: the large majority of CBL’s revenue is recurring or repeat-driven because leases typically run multiple years and rent is billed monthly. One-time or less-recurring items can include lease termination income, land or outparcel sales, and discrete redevelopment-related transactions.
- Revenue model: base rent is the core stream, supplemented by reimbursements for common-area maintenance, real estate taxes, and insurance, plus percentage rent in some leases and ancillary income from temporary leasing, sponsorship, or other property-level programs.
- How pricing power works: pricing power depends on the local competitiveness of each center. CBL has more leverage when a property remains dominant in its trade area and suitable space is scarce. Pricing power is weaker in challenged malls, in weak retail categories, or when a large vacancy creates co-tenancy pressure.
- Why business mix matters: open-air centers usually have a different tenant mix and traffic pattern from enclosed malls, often with greater exposure to necessity, value, and service categories. For CBL, adding more non-apparel, food, and experiential uses can make cash flow more stable and reduce reliance on legacy department-store traffic.
- What drives margin and cash generation: for a REIT, gross margin is less useful than property-level net operating income. The real drivers are occupancy, rent collections, releasing spreads, expense recoveries, real estate tax and insurance inflation, maintenance and redevelopment capital, and interest expense. Depreciation also distorts GAAP operating margins, which is why investors focus heavily on net operating income, funds from operations, and adjusted funds from operations.
4. What Products and/or Services Does CBL Properties Sell?
CBL Properties sells real estate access and occupancy solutions rather than manufactured products. Its main offerings are tied to how different types of retail and service tenants use space.
- Enclosed mall space: inline stores, junior-anchor locations, and anchor boxes within regional malls and lifestyle-oriented properties.
- Open-air shopping-center space: storefronts and larger-format spaces in open-air centers, often suited to value retail, services, food, and convenience-oriented uses.
- Pad sites and outparcels: standalone restaurant, retail, or service locations on the edge of larger properties. These can be leased, developed, or occasionally monetized through sales.
- Temporary and specialty leasing: kiosks, carts, seasonal tenants, short-term tenants, and other flexible occupancy formats that help monetize common space and test demand.
- Ancillary property income opportunities: advertising, sponsorship, and similar programs at selected properties.
- Property management and related services: where applicable, CBL may earn limited fees tied to property management or related activities, but this is not the core economic engine.
The offerings that matter most economically are the recurring leases in owned properties. The offerings that matter most strategically are the redevelopment and re-leasing of older boxes and underused parcels, because that is where CBL can materially change the earnings power of a center.
5. What Are the Key Competitors or Peers of CBL Properties?
Shopping-center competition is highly local, so these companies are best viewed as peers and capital-market comparables rather than direct one-for-one competitors in every market. CBL also competes indirectly with e-commerce, power centers, and standalone retail corridors.
| Company | Type | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Property Group | Public mall REIT | The largest U.S. mall owner and an important benchmark for leasing, redevelopment, and capital access, although Simon’s portfolio skews higher quality and more premium than CBL’s. |
| Macerich | Public mall REIT | A major owner of regional malls in stronger metro markets; useful peer on mall operations and redevelopment, but generally more class-A than CBL. |
| Brookfield Properties | Private owner/operator | A large owner of U.S. malls and mixed-use assets that competes for national tenants and redevelopment capital. |
| Washington Prime Group | Private mall and shopping-center owner | One of the closest portfolio comparables because of its exposure to middle-market malls and open-air assets after restructuring. |
| PREIT | Private/restructured mall owner | A smaller mall operator whose repositioning challenges have overlapped with those of non-top-tier mall portfolios. |
| Tanger | Public outlet REIT | A value-oriented retail real estate peer that competes for some tenants and shopper spend, though the format is different. |
| Kite Realty Group | Public open-air shopping-center REIT | An important benchmark for open-air center economics, merchandising, and service-heavy tenant mix. |
| Brixmor Property Group | Public open-air shopping-center REIT | A large open-air landlord competing for many of the same omnichannel, discount, and service tenants. |
| Regency Centers | Public open-air shopping-center REIT | More of a best-practice benchmark than a direct portfolio match, especially in grocery-anchored open-air retail. |
In practice, CBL’s most immediate competition is often local: other retail nodes in the same trade area, freestanding big-box corridors, grocery-anchored centers, and online channels that reduce store demand in weaker categories.
6. What Is the Marketing Strategy of CBL Properties?
CBL Properties’ marketing strategy operates on two levels. First, it markets space to tenants. Second, it markets individual centers to shoppers in order to support tenant sales.
On the tenant side, marketing is closely tied to leasing. CBL needs to present each center’s traffic, demographics, trade-area role, co-tenancy, and redevelopment potential to national chains, regional operators, and local businesses. In that sense, leasing materials, broker relationships, site plans, and category knowledge matter more than broad corporate brand advertising.
On the consumer side, the marketing approach appears to be local and property specific. Mall and center marketing typically includes seasonal events, promotions, digital channels, social media, community partnerships, and campaigns designed to drive visits and keep the center relevant beyond pure shopping. For CBL, this is a supporting capability rather than the main source of competitive advantage. The real differentiator is whether the center has the right tenant mix and a credible local reason for consumers to visit.
7. What Are the Key Customer Segments of CBL Properties?
CBL’s paying customers are tenants and other occupants. Shoppers are not direct revenue customers, but they are the demand engine that makes the tenant base valuable.
- National chain retailers: important for occupancy, traffic, and merchandising credibility. These include apparel, value retail, footwear, beauty, and specialty chains.
- Regional and local retailers: especially important in middle-market trade areas where local operators can differentiate a center and backfill space more flexibly.
- Restaurants and food concepts: increasingly important because dining extends dwell time and supports evening and weekend traffic.
- Entertainment, fitness, and experiential tenants: a strategic growth category for former anchor space and for making centers less dependent on traditional mall shopping patterns.
- Service tenants: beauty, health, financial services, education, telecom, and other service uses that create repeat visits and are relatively resistant to online substitution.
- Big-box, anchor, and junior-anchor users: these matter disproportionately because they affect co-tenancy, traffic, and the economics of large-format space.
CBL is diversified across many tenants and categories, but it is still exposed to broader retail-sector stress. Tenant bankruptcies, weak categories, and anchor disruption can ripple through an entire center.
8. What Is the Sales Model of CBL Properties?
CBL’s sales model is fundamentally a direct leasing model. The company goes to market through internal leasing teams, property-level personnel, and broker relationships where useful. National accounts are negotiated centrally, while local and regional tenants may be sourced through a mix of internal outreach and market relationships.
The sales process is consultative and asset specific. It involves site selection, floorplan discussions, rent negotiations, tenant-improvement packages, co-tenancy and exclusivity provisions, expense recoveries, credit review, and build-out coordination. Leases are typically negotiated over a longer cycle than a standard product sale, and signed deals do not convert to revenue until the space opens.
This channel structure gives CBL close customer intimacy and direct control over tenant mix, but it also means growth depends on leasing productivity, construction timelines, and the health of retail demand in each category. It also creates clear opportunities for outside experts in pipeline analytics, leasing process redesign, tenant prospecting, broker management, and opening-readiness improvement.
9. In What Geographies Does CBL Properties Operate?
CBL Properties operates entirely in the United States. Its portfolio is more concentrated in the Southeast and Midwest than in coastal gateway markets, and it is especially associated with secondary and tertiary trade areas rather than major global cities.
That geographic profile is strategically important. In many of CBL’s markets, the local mall or shopping center can still hold a meaningful share of physical retail activity because there may be fewer directly comparable alternatives nearby. At the same time, those markets may offer lower rents, lower land values, and lower liquidity than top-tier coastal markets.
Corporate functions are centered in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Day-to-day operations are distributed across individual properties, where local management teams handle tenant coordination, maintenance, marketing, and operating execution. CBL does not have a material international operating footprint.
10. Who Are the Owners of CBL Properties?
CBL Properties is publicly traded, and no controlling shareholder is publicly disclosed. As of 2024 public institutional filings, major shareholders included large asset managers such as BlackRock and Vanguard. Like many public REITs, ownership is largely institutional and can shift over time. Management and directors also hold shares, but the company appears to have dispersed ownership rather than founder or family control.
11. How Is CBL Properties Organized?
At a practical level, CBL Properties is organized as a retail REIT with a centralized corporate structure and a distributed property operating model.
- Legal structure: the public parent is CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., and like many REITs it uses an operating partnership and subsidiaries to hold assets and conduct business.
- Reporting structure: the company reports one operating and reportable segment focused on shopping center properties.
- Operating structure: core corporate functions include leasing, redevelopment, finance, accounting, legal, and executive oversight, while property-level teams handle daily center operations.
- Portfolio structure: assets may be wholly owned or held through joint ventures and property-specific entities, which is common in real estate.
This matters because the company’s economics are generated property by property, even though capital allocation and financing decisions are made centrally.
12. How Does CBL Properties Operate?
CBL creates value by operating, leasing, and selectively redeveloping shopping centers over long periods of time. Day-to-day operations center on a few repeatable activities:
- Merchandising and leasing: deciding what categories and tenants belong in each center, negotiating leases, and replacing weak or vacated stores.
- Property operations: maintaining the physical plant, security, janitorial services, utilities, parking, landscaping, and common areas so the center remains functional and attractive to tenants and shoppers.
- Tenant coordination: managing openings, renewals, store build-outs, signage, operating compliance, and tenant issues.
- Redevelopment and capital projects: reworking anchor boxes, reconfiguring space, building pad sites, and adapting older properties to new tenant formats.
- Capital and risk management: collecting rent, recovering operating expenses where lease terms allow, managing debt, monitoring liquidity, and prioritizing capital expenditures.
The main operational bottlenecks are tenant bankruptcies, long vacancy downtime, co-tenancy complications, construction lead times, real estate tax and insurance inflation, and the challenge of financing redevelopment at attractive returns. In a mall portfolio, one vacant anchor can affect traffic and leasing well beyond the square footage it occupies.
13. What Are the Growth Opportunities for CBL Properties?
Most plausible growth opportunities
- Occupancy improvement: filling vacant inline and junior-anchor space can raise rent revenue and improve center productivity without requiring major acquisitions.
- Anchor-box redevelopment: converting obsolete department-store space into higher-productivity uses remains one of CBL’s clearest value-creation levers.
- Tenant-mix diversification: adding more food, entertainment, services, health, beauty, and value retail can make traffic more durable and less seasonal.
- Outparcel and land monetization: underused land and parking fields can support pad development, parcel sales, or other forms of densification where zoning and demand allow.
- Open-air and convenience-oriented formats: a stronger mix of open-air and service-heavy retail could improve resilience relative to traditional enclosed-mall exposure.
- Selective external opportunities: as an outside inference rather than a clearly stated core priority, dislocation in retail real estate could eventually create selective acquisition or joint-venture opportunities at attractive pricing.
Main constraints
- E-commerce and category pressure: some retail categories remain structurally vulnerable, especially in weaker malls.
- Retailer bankruptcies and store rationalization: these can erase leasing gains quickly and create costly downtime.
- Capital intensity: redevelopment often requires meaningful upfront spending before rent begins.
- Interest rates and financing markets: refinancing costs can absorb a large share of operating improvement.
- Insurance, tax, and operating-cost inflation: these can pressure property-level net operating income if recoveries are incomplete.
14. What Is the History of CBL Properties?
CBL Properties traces its roots to 1978, when Charles B. Lebovitz founded the business in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The company grew during the rise of the modern REIT industry and became publicly traded in 1993. Over the following decades, CBL expanded through development, joint ventures, and acquisitions, building a sizable portfolio of malls and other shopping-center assets across the United States.
Like many mall owners, CBL came under pressure in the 2010s as department stores weakened, e-commerce accelerated, and retailer bankruptcies increased. The pandemic intensified those stresses by disrupting rent collection, traffic, and financing conditions. In November 2020, CBL filed for Chapter 11 protection. It emerged from restructuring in November 2021 with materially lower debt and a simplified strategic agenda.
The post-restructuring era has been defined less by rapid expansion and more by repositioning: improving occupancy, reusing former anchor space, recycling capital, and trying to turn a challenged but still relevant portfolio into a steadier cash-flow business.
15. What Are the Key Suppliers to CBL Properties?
CBL Properties is not a manufacturing business, so its supplier base is primarily service and project driven rather than raw-material driven. Suppliers still matter strategically because property uptime, tenant satisfaction, redevelopment execution, and operating-cost control all depend on them.
- Construction and redevelopment partners: general contractors, architects, engineers, and specialty trades are critical for anchor-box conversions, tenant build-outs, pad development, roofing, paving, and structural upgrades.
- Property services vendors: janitorial, security, landscaping, waste management, parking, and facility-maintenance providers directly affect the tenant and shopper experience.
- Building systems vendors: HVAC, elevator and escalator, lighting, fire-safety, and energy-management suppliers are important because malls and shopping centers are complex physical assets.
- Utilities and infrastructure providers: electric, water, telecom, and related service providers are essential to daily operations.
- Insurance and risk partners: insurers and brokers matter more than they once did because rising insurance costs can materially affect net operating income.
- Technology vendors: property-management, accounting, leasing, digital-marketing, and analytics systems support the back office and tenant-facing processes.
No single supplier appears publicly disclosed as uniquely dominant. Strategically, what matters is vendor reliability, purchasing discipline, and the ability to deliver redevelopments on time and within budget.
16. What Are the Key Assets of CBL Properties?
CBL Properties is an asset-heavy business. Its most important assets are the centers themselves and the land positions around them.
- Regional malls and open-air centers: these are the core cash-generating assets and the foundation of the company’s leasing and redevelopment strategy.
- Land, parking fields, and outparcels: underused land can create optionality for restaurants, freestanding retail, service uses, and in some cases broader redevelopment.
- Former anchor boxes: although often a source of current weakness, these large spaces are also strategic assets because successful reuse can transform a property’s economics.
- Trade-area position: in retail real estate, the local dominance of a site can matter more than the corporate brand. A center that remains important in its market is a valuable asset even if the overall mall sector is under pressure.
- Tenant relationships and lease base: long-term leases with a diversified roster of tenants create recurring income and make future redevelopment more financeable.
Asset intensity raises both barriers and risk. CBL benefits from hard-to-replicate locations and existing infrastructure, but returns are highly sensitive to occupancy, capex needs, and financing costs. Small changes in rent or vacancy can have an outsized impact because the physical asset base carries substantial fixed costs.
17. What Is the Finance Strategy of CBL Properties?
Finance strategy is especially important at CBL because the company’s recent history includes a major restructuring. Since emerging from Chapter 11 in 2021, the public posture has appeared more conservative and execution-focused than expansionary.
- Protect liquidity: maintaining enough cash and financing flexibility to operate properties and fund selective redevelopment is a core priority.
- Manage debt maturities and refinancing risk: for a retail REIT, the maturity ladder and cost of debt can matter as much as operating improvement. A center’s cash flow only creates equity value if financing does not absorb it.
- Fund high-return redevelopment first: CBL appears to emphasize projects that can measurably improve occupancy, traffic, and rents rather than broad speculative expansion.
- Use capital recycling selectively: parcel monetization, dispositions, and similar actions can help fund redevelopment or reduce leverage.
- Balance REIT obligations with recovery needs: as a REIT, the company must also consider taxable income distribution requirements, but balance-sheet resilience remains central to strategic execution.
In real estate, working capital is less important than rent collections, capital expenditure discipline, and interest expense. For CBL, finance strategy supports the broader corporate strategy by buying time and flexibility for a multi-year repositioning of the portfolio.
18. How Companies Like CBL Properties Leverage Independent Consultants through Umbrex
Umbrex has built a global community of more than 8,000 independent management consultants based in over 50 countries. These consultants are alumni of McKinsey, Bain, BCG, and other top firms. Companies like CBL Properties use Umbrex when they need top-tier consulting talent, but do not need a full consulting team and its associated overhead. For a retail REIT, that can be particularly useful on focused, high-value workstreams tied to portfolio strategy, redevelopment, operations, finance, technology, ERP, and AI.
- Asset-by-asset portfolio strategy: segment each property into hold, invest, redevelop, recapitalize, or exit buckets based on local market strength, capex needs, and cash-flow outlook.
- Former anchor-box redevelopment business cases: evaluate the best use of large vacancies across retail, entertainment, fitness, medical, self-storage, or mixed-use alternatives.
- Tenant-mix optimization: identify which categories are underrepresented, overexposed, or most likely to improve traffic and sales productivity in each center.
- Open-air versus enclosed-mall capital allocation: build a fact base for where incremental redevelopment dollars are likely to generate the best returns.
- Property operating-cost reduction: benchmark security, janitorial, utilities, maintenance, insurance, and vendor spend to improve net operating income without harming the tenant experience.
- Debt, liquidity, and capital-allocation scenario modeling: support management and the board with decision tools around refinancing, dispositions, redevelopment pacing, and shareholder-return tradeoffs.
- Outparcel and densification strategy: create a repeatable process to monetize excess land through pad development, parcel sales, joint ventures, or broader mixed-use concepts.
- Leasing process redesign: improve pipeline visibility, broker management, lease approval speed, tenant opening readiness, and CRM discipline for national and local accounts.
- AI-enabled traffic and lease-risk analytics: use data science to forecast shopper visits, identify at-risk tenants, prioritize renewals, and improve redevelopment sequencing.
- PMO support for major redevelopments or portfolio actions: provide independent program-management support for large redevelopment, refinancing, or disposition workstreams that cut across leasing, construction, finance, and operations.