Goal of the analysis:
The goal of this analysis is to compare planned or estimated mineral inventory with actual production and stockpile measurements. This helps identify discrepancies, improve forecasting accuracy, and optimize mining operations to align with expected outcomes.
Data required:
- Mine production plans and forecasts (planned grades and tonnages).
- Actual production data (grades and tonnages extracted).
- Stockpile measurements (pre- and post-mining).
- Processing plant data (recovered metal or mineral quantities).
- Geology and grade control data (assay results, resource models).
Detailed step-by-step instruction on how to conduct the analysis:
- Collect Planned Inventory Data:
- Extract planned grades and tonnages from the mine’s short-term and long-term production plans.
- Gather Actual Production Data:
- Record actual grades and tonnages extracted during the analysis period.
- Include data from stockpile movements and processing outputs.
- Calculate Variances for Key Metrics:
- Use the formula for variance:
Variance (%) = [(Actual – Planned) / Planned] x 100 - Perform variance calculations for tonnage, grade, and metal content.
- Use the formula for variance:
- Reconcile Stockpile Data:
- Compare physical stockpile measurements with calculated values based on material movement records.
- Analyze Processing Performance:
- Assess the amount of metal or mineral recovered at the processing plant relative to planned recoveries.
- Identify Discrepancies:
- Pinpoint areas where significant variances occur (e.g., geological modeling, mining methods, processing losses).
- Perform Root Cause Analysis: Investigate causes of discrepancies, such as:
- Geological model inaccuracies.
- Mining inefficiencies or dilution.
- Processing plant recovery losses.
- Benchmark Against Industry Standards:
- Compare variance levels with industry benchmarks to evaluate performance.
- Develop Improvement Strategies:
- Propose changes to geological modeling, mining methods, or processing techniques to minimize future variances.
Format of the output of analysis:
- Reconciliation Table showing planned vs. actual metrics for tonnage, grade, and metal content.
- Variance Chart visualizing discrepancies across multiple metrics.
- Root Cause Analysis Summary identifying key issues and their impact.
- Narrative Report with findings, insights, and recommendations for improvement.
How to interpret results:
- Low Variances: Indicates accurate planning and efficient operations.
- High Positive Variances: Suggests underestimated resource potential but may require validation of measurement accuracy.
- High Negative Variances: Highlights inefficiencies or inaccuracies that need immediate attention.
- Recurring Variances in Specific Areas: Points to systemic issues, such as flawed geological models or process inefficiencies.
Steps a company can take to improve on this measure:
- Enhance geological modeling accuracy using updated drilling data and advanced modeling software.
- Implement stricter grade control practices during mining operations to reduce dilution and ore loss.
- Regularly calibrate stockpile measurement equipment to ensure accurate inventory tracking.
- Improve communication and coordination between geology, mining, and processing teams.
- Conduct periodic audits of reconciliation processes to identify and address gaps.
- Train staff in variance analysis and problem-solving methodologies to reduce future discrepancies.
Request the PDF Download of How to Analyze a Metals & Mining Company
